ABSTRACT
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided hepaticogastrostomy (HGS) is widely performed not only as an alternative to transpapillary biliary drainage, but also as primary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction. For anatomical reasons, this technique carries an unavoidable risk of mispuncturing intrahepatic vessels. We report a technique for troubleshooting EUS-guided portal vein coiling to prevent bleeding from the intrahepatic portal vein after mispuncture during interventional EUS. EUS-HGS was planned for a 59-year-old male patient with unresectable pancreatic cancer. The dilated bile duct (lumen diameter, 2.8 mm) was punctured with a 19-gauge needle, and a guidewire was inserted. After bougie dilation, the guidewire was found to be inside the intrahepatic portal vein. Embolizing coils were placed to prevent bleeding. Embolization coils were successfully inserted under stabilization of the catheter using a double-lumen cannula with a guidewire. Following these procedures, the patient was asymptomatic. Computed tomography performed the next day revealed no complications.
ABSTRACT
Background/Aims@#The Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society (JGES) has published guidelines for gastroenterological endoscopy in patients undergoing antithrombotic treatment. These guidelines classify endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) as a high-risk procedure. Nevertheless, the bleeding risk of EUS-BD in patients undergoing antithrombotic therapy is uncertain. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the bleeding risk in patients undergoing antithrombotic therapy. @*Methods@#This single-center retrospective study included 220 consecutive patients who underwent EUS-BD between January 2013 and December 2018. We managed the withdrawal and continuation of antithrombotic agents according to the JGES guidelines. We compared the bleeding event rates among patients who received and those who did not receive antithrombotic agents. @*Results@#A total of 18 patients (8.1%) received antithrombotic agents and 202 patients (91.8%) did not. Three patients experienced bleeding events, with an overall bleeding event rate of 1.3% (3/220): one patient was in the antithrombotic group (5.5%) and two patients were in the non-antithrombotic group (0.9%) (p=0.10). All cases were moderate. The sole thromboembolic event (0.4%) was a cerebral infarction in a patient in the non-antithrombotic group. @*Conclusions@#The rate of EUS-BD-related bleeding events was low. Even in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy, the bleeding event rates were not significantly different from those in patients not receiving antithrombotic therapy.
ABSTRACT
Background/Aims@#The Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society (JGES) has published guidelines for gastroenterological endoscopy in patients undergoing antithrombotic treatment. These guidelines classify endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) as a high-risk procedure. Nevertheless, the bleeding risk of EUS-BD in patients undergoing antithrombotic therapy is uncertain. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the bleeding risk in patients undergoing antithrombotic therapy. @*Methods@#This single-center retrospective study included 220 consecutive patients who underwent EUS-BD between January 2013 and December 2018. We managed the withdrawal and continuation of antithrombotic agents according to the JGES guidelines. We compared the bleeding event rates among patients who received and those who did not receive antithrombotic agents. @*Results@#A total of 18 patients (8.1%) received antithrombotic agents and 202 patients (91.8%) did not. Three patients experienced bleeding events, with an overall bleeding event rate of 1.3% (3/220): one patient was in the antithrombotic group (5.5%) and two patients were in the non-antithrombotic group (0.9%) (p=0.10). All cases were moderate. The sole thromboembolic event (0.4%) was a cerebral infarction in a patient in the non-antithrombotic group. @*Conclusions@#The rate of EUS-BD-related bleeding events was low. Even in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy, the bleeding event rates were not significantly different from those in patients not receiving antithrombotic therapy.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) under endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) guidance can be an option to treat difficult stones. Recently, a digital, single-operator cholangioscope (SPY-DS) has become available. Peroral transluminal cholangioscopy (PTLC) using SPY-DS has also been reported. In this retrospective study, the technical feasibility and clinical effectiveness of EHL for difficult bile duct stones under ERCP guidance and under PTLC guidance was examined. METHODS: In this pilot study, patients with difficult bile duct stones between July 2016 and July 2017 were retrospectively enrolled. RESULTS: Forty-two consecutive patients underwent EHL using a SPY-DS; 34 patients underwent EHL under ERCP guidance, and the other 8 patients underwent EHL under PTLC guidance. Median procedure time was 31 minutes (range, 19 to 66 minutes). The median number of EHL sessions was 1 (range, 1 to 2), and that of ERCP sessions was also 1 (range, 1 to 3). The rate of complete stone clearance was 98% (41/42). Adverse events such as cholangitis and acute pancreatitis were seen in 14% (6/42), which could be treated conservatively. CONCLUSIONS: EHL using SPY-DS was technically feasible, not only under ERCP guidance, but also PTLC guidance. A prospective clinical study of EHL using SPY-DS is needed.
Subject(s)
Humans , Bile Ducts , Bile , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Cholangitis , Clinical Study , Common Bile Duct , Lithotripsy , Pancreatitis , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recently, recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rTM) has been developed as a new drug for disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). This study aims to evaluate the clinical benefit of rTM in patients with sepsis-induced DIC caused by acute cholangitis who underwent biliary drainage. METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups: the rTM therapy group and the non-rTM therapy group. The primary outcome was the DIC resolution rate at 7 days, and the secondary outcome was 28-day mortality rate. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were treated by rTM, and 36 patients were treated without rTM for DIC. The rate of resolution of DIC at day 7 was significantly higher in the rTM group than in the non-rTM group (82.9% vs 55.6%, p=0.0012). Compared with the non-rTM group, the 28-day survival rate of the r-TM group was significantly higher (rTM vs non-rTM, 91.4% vs 69.4%, p=0.014). According to multivariate analysis, non-rTM (hazard ratio [HR], 2.681) and CRP (HR, 2.370) were factors related to decreased survival. CONCLUSIONS: rTM treatment may have a positive impact on improving DIC and survival rates in patients with severe acute cholangitis.